Caritas Cancer Institute, Kottayam, Kerala
drjojovjoseph@gmail.com
Connect on WhatsApp

Articles

How to identity Cancer Risk

A Guide to Understanding the Global Cancer Agency's Assessment on Cancer Risk

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which is part of the World Health Organization (WHO), plays a pivotal role in researching and evaluating potentially carcinogenic substances and activities. The IARC maintains a comprehensive classification system that helps policymakers, scientists, and the general public understand the potential risks associated with various agents. In this article, we explore the IARC's classification system, its significance, and its impact on public health policies.

Understanding the IARC Classification:

The IARC identifies substances, mixtures, occupational exposures, physical agents, biological agents, and lifestyle factors that could potentially lead to cancer development in humans. Their classification system employs five categories:

  1. Group 1: Carcinogenic to humans: This category refers to agents where scientific evidence establishes their link to cancer in humans. Substances falling under Group 1 include tobacco, asbestos, and ultraviolet radiation from the sun.
  2. Group 2A: Probably carcinogenic to humans: In this category, there is limited evidence from human studies, but strong evidence from animal studies suggesting a potential carcinogenicity. Examples include glyphosate, the active ingredient in some herbicides, and certain occupations involving shift work.
  3. Group 2B: Possibly carcinogenic to humans: Agents in this category have limited evidence of carcinogenicity in humans and less conclusive evidence from animal studies. Mobile phones, coffee, and talcum powder are some examples of substances classified in Group 2B.
  4. Group 3: Not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity in humans: This category applies to agents where the available evidence does not allow a clear determination of carcinogenicity. This classification does not indicate that an agent is safe but rather that there isn't enough data to make a firm conclusion.
  5. Group 4: Probably not carcinogenic to humans: This category includes substances or activities that are not considered to be carcinogenic based on the available evidence. An example of this can be seen in mild coffee consumption.

Implications and Public Health Impact:

The IARC's classification system is critical for public health as it helps policymakers, regulatory agencies, and individuals make informed decisions regarding potential carcinogens. Governments worldwide use these classifications to develop regulations aimed at reducing exposure to cancer-causing agents.

Businesses are also influenced by IARC classifications. Companies involved in the production or use of Group 1 agents often face stringent regulations, while those associated with Group 2A substances may face increased scrutiny and calls for risk management strategies.

It is important to note that the IARC classifications should be considered in conjunction with other scientific evidence and risk assessments. The evaluation process carries its limitations, such as the focus on hazard identification, which does not incorporate potency or dose-response assessments.

Conclusion:

The IARC's classification system on carcinogens serves as a vital tool for public health agencies, scientists, policymakers, and individuals to raise awareness about potential cancer risks. By understanding the IARC's classifications, we can make informed choices, advocate for necessary policy changes, and promote a safer environment. It is crucial to stay up to date with revised classifications as new scientific evidence emerges, contributing to our collective efforts to combat cancer and improve overall public health.